Name
:-
Nargis Ibrahimbhai Saiyad
Roll
no: - 13
Class:
-
M.A. Sem.-IV
Paper:
-
Thomas Hardy as a novelist
Topic:
- Hardy’s
art of characterization
-:
Submitted to:-
Heenaba Zala,
Dept.
of English,
M.K.
Bhavnagar University,
Bhavnagar.
Hardy’s art of
Characterization
Hardy is a very
well-known author. His most of the characters are of the poor rural class. Hardy’s
characters show glimpse of Victorian
people. The characters lives are ruled by rigid Victorian social conventions.
ü Hardy’s style-
We can say,
Hardy’s style is roughhewn, sometimes awkward. It is that we always find his
style as intense and commanding.
ü Figures of literature-
We find variety in
figures. Hardy’s command over human personality is extensive. For the
characters, we can say,
“a gallery of
everlasting delight”
Tess,
Eustacia, Bathsheba, Elizabeth-Jane are examples of it.
ü Methods of characterization-
If we read all his
characters, we find some common characteristics.
Ø Description set description-
He uses the line like “Drink to me only with
thine eyes”. Here, every phrase is salient and arresting. He doesn't give
catalogue of Eustacia’s charms.
We
cannot call “Items of face and figure” to man or woman if we think according
to Hardy’s perspective.
Ø Use of metaphors, comparisons, incidental touches-
“Vivid
descriptive phrases, metaphorical illuminations and revealing comparisons,
chance utterances of the man himself etc.” - Duflin
We find a wealth of
metaphors in Hardy’s works. For example, “buffalo wrong-headedness”
Ø Humanity-
Hardy’s
characters are life-like, real. They feel ordinary joys and sorrows. They are
gems, but Hawed gems. The instances of perfection are few.
Ø No
unredeemed villains-
Hardy doesn't portray perfect characters. Even in
villains, also. For example, Alec in ‘Tess of the D’Urbervilles’
We find
some good characteristics in the villains, too. Hardy cannot fully paint at
length odious people.
Ø Universality-
We find
Hardy’s characters Universal because they are realistic, life-like. If we say
them only realistic then it is not so. They are more Universals. There are
other characters that get below individual differences and qualities, classify
individuals and thus arrive at type.
Ø Limitations-
Hardy also
has some limitations in writing. It reminds one saying,
“Every coin
has two sides”
We can
classify the similarity like this:
Ø Unsuccessful intellectuals-
We find
that the intellectuals in Hardy’s works selfish, hard, hearted. For e.g,
Clare
fails Tess at the greatest crisis of her life because of his hard logical
aspect.
Ø Failing of upper class people-
Almost all
his characters belong to Wessex of
other lower class society. If he chooses other, he makes mistake. In reason he
says.
“The conduct of the upper class is screened by
conventions and thus the real character is not seen.”
Ø Repetition-
“Man’s predicament in the Universe.”
We see the
idea of philosophy in his works. In each novel, he shows man ranged against
cure luck. That’s why they have a family likeness.
Ø No psycho-analysis-
We find
simple natured people from Hardy’s works but we do not get complex characters
in his writing.
Ø Examples:-
1). ‘Return of the
Native’-
The characters
Clym and Eustacia are such characters that we recognize
human-being, their conversation action, irritation etc… Though some say that
Hardy’s great success is with subtle characters but his people are realized when
they are very simple foe example,
Rustics - Grandfer and Christian cantle
Sturdy countrymen - Diggory Venn
Passionate wayward - Eustacia
Plausible rogue -
Wildeve
The characterization of male here are
praiseworthy.
2). ‘Tess of the D 'Urbervilles-
§ Authorial comment-
The chapter 27
is with full personality of Tess sometimes he stops narration to point out
certain facets.
For example,
‘With
the woman instinct to hide she diverged hastily…’
§ ‘Tess as a vessel of emotions’-
Tess is very traditional
and aunt rational and intelligence so, we can call her a vessel of emotions
rather than reasons.
§ Tess’s aristocratic traits-
In ch.21,
when comparing Tess to other dairy maid Hardy states Tess is ‘more fifthly formed’.
He also talks about the burden of aristocracy.
§ Tess as a woman in love-
The tension of
happiness and unhappiness co-existing is we portrayed. For him the pasts for
all love is deeply. He writes ‘the invincible instinct towards self delight’.
Tess has also fault
like hereditary flaws, passivity in the face of fate, sexual sin etc.
ü Conclusion-
In all Hardy’s
novels we find something spiritual. As Duflin points out,
“Each one of his great
novels is a soul’s tragedy, such as we do not get anywhere else outside
Shakespeare”.
His characterization is
not only external lit is also internal. He probes into the hidden depth of the
soul and explore mysteries of souls of ordinary people.